Tuesday, January 27, 2009

John Updike, Prize-Winning Writer, Dead at Age 76

I haven’t read much of John Updike’s work, but that which I have I have really liked, especially his short story “A&P,” and The Witches of Eastwick wasn’t all that bad either, and I absolutely loved him as Krusty the Clown’s ghostwriter in the episode “Insane Clown Poppy“ (which also starred authors Stephen King and Amy Tan). It is always sad when the literary community loses one of its luminaries. Mr. Updike, you will be sorely missed.


by Hillel Italie, 12:00:00 PM EST, Tuesday, January 27, 2009

NEW YORK (AP)—John Updike, the Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist, prolific man of letters and erudite chronicler of sex, divorce and other adventures in the postwar prime of the American empire, died Tuesday at age 76. Updike, a resident of Beverly Farms, Massachusetts, died of lung cancer, according to a statement from his publisher, Alfred A. Knopf.

A literary writer who frequently appeared on best-seller lists, the tall, hawk-nosed Updike wrote novels, short stories, poems, criticism, the memoir Self-Consciousness and even a famous essay about baseball great Ted Williams. He was prolific, even compulsive, releasing more than 50 books in a career that started in the 1950s. Updike won virtually every literary prize, including two Pulitzers, for Rabbit is Rich and Rabbit at Rest, and two National Book Awards. Although himself deprived of a Nobel, he did bestow it upon one of his fictional characters, Henry Bech, the womanizing, egotistical Jewish novelist who collected the literature prize in 1999.

His settings ranged from the court of Hamlet to postcolonial Africa, but his literary home was the American suburb. Born in 1932, Updike spoke for millions of Depression-era readers raised by “penny-pinching parents,” united by “the patriotic cohesion of World War II” and blessed by a “disproportionate share of the world’s resources,” the postwar, suburban boom of “idealistic careers and early marriages.”

He captured, and sometimes embodied, a generation’s confusion over the civil rights and women’s movements, and opposition to the Vietnam War. Updike was called a misogynist, a racist and an apologist for the establishment. On purely literary grounds, he was attacked by Norman Mailer as the kind of author appreciated by readers who knew nothing about writing. But more often he was praised for his flowing, poetic writing style. Describing a man’s interrupted quest to make love, Updike likened it “to a small angel to which all afternoon tiny lead weights are attached.” Nothing was too great or too small for Updike to poeticize. He might rhapsodize over the film projector’s “chuckling whir” or look to the stars and observe that “the universe is perfectly transparent: we exist as flaws in ancient glass.”

In the richest detail, his books recorded the extremes of earthly desire and spiritual zealotry, whether the comic philandering of the preacher in A Month of Sundays or the steady rage of the young Muslim in Terrorist. Raised in the Protestant community of Shillington, Pennsylvania, where the Lord’s Prayer was recited daily at school, Updike was a lifelong churchgoer influenced by his faith, but not immune to doubts.

“I remember the times when I was wrestling with these issues that I would feel crushed. I was crushed by the purely materialistic, atheistic account of the universe,” Updike told The Associated Press during a 2006 interview. “I am very prone to accept all that the scientists tell us, the truth of it, the authority of the efforts of all the men and woman spent trying to understand more about atoms and molecules. But I can’t quite make the leap of unfaith, as it were, and say, ‘This is it. Carpe diem (seize the day), and tough luck.’”

He received his greatest acclaim for the “Rabbit” series, a quartet of novels published over a 30-year span that featured ex-high school basketball star Harry “Rabbit” Angstrom and his restless adjustment to adulthood and the constraints of work and family. To the very end, Harry was in motion, an innocent in his belief that any door could be opened, a believer in God even as he bedded women other than his wife.

“The tetralogy to me is the tale of a life, a life led an American citizen who shares the national passion for youth, freedom, and sex, the national openness and willingness to learn, the national habit of improvisation,” Updike would later write. “He is furthermore a Protestant, haunted by a God whose manifestations are elusive, yet all-important.” Other notable books included Couples, a sexually explicit tale of suburban mating that sold millions of copies; In the Beauty of the Lilies, an epic of American faith and fantasy; and Too Far to Go, which followed the courtship, marriage and divorce of the Maples, a suburban couple with parallels to Updike’s own first marriage.

Plagued from an early age by asthma, psoriasis and a stammer, he found creative outlets in drawing and writing. Updike was born in Reading, Pennsylvania, his mother a department store worker who longed to write, his father a high school teacher remembered with sadness and affection in The Centaur, a novel published in 1964. The author brooded over his father’s low pay and mocking students, but also wrote of a childhood of “warm and action-packed houses that accommodated the presence of a stranger, my strange ambition to be glamorous.”

For Updike, the high life meant books, such as the volumes of P.G. Wodehouse and Robert Benchley he borrowed from the library as a child, or, as he later recalled, the “chastely severe, time-honored classics” he read in his dorm room at Harvard University, leaning back in his “wooden Harvard chair,” cigarette in hand.

While studying on full scholarship at Harvard, he headed the staff of the Harvard Lampoon and met the woman who became his first wife, Mary Entwistle Pennington, whom he married in June 1953, a year before he earned his A.B. degree summa cum laude. (Updike divorced Pennington in 1975 and was remarried two years later, to Martha Bernhard).

After graduating, he accepted a one-year fellowship to study painting at the Ruskin School of Drawing and Fine Arts at Oxford University. During his stay in England, a literary idol, E.B. White, offered him a position at The New Yorker, where he served briefly as foreign books reviewer. Many of Updike’s reviews and short stories were published in The New Yorker, often edited by White’s stepson, Roger Angell.

By the end of the 1950s, Updike had published a story collection, a book of poetry and his first novel, The Poorhouse Fair, soon followed by the first of the Rabbit books, Rabbit, Run. Praise came so early and so often that New York Times critic Arthur Mizener worried that Updike’s “natural talent” was exposing him “from an early age to a great deal of head-turning praise.”

Updike learned to write about everyday life by, in part, living it. In 1957, he left New York, with its “cultural hassle” and melting pot of “agents and wisenheimers,” and settled with his first wife and four kids in Ipswich, Massachusetts, a “rather out-of-the-way town” about 30 miles north of Boston.

“The real America seemed to me ‘out there,’ too heterogeneous and electrified by now to pose much threat of the provinciality that people used to come to New York to escape,” Updike later wrote. “There were also practical attractions: free parking for my car, public education for my children, a beach to tan my skin on, a church to attend without seeming too strange.”

Monday, January 26, 2009

The Poetry of Robert Frost: The Collected Poems, Complete and Unabridged

by Robert Frost
edited by Edward Connery Lathem
(New York: Holt Paperbacks, 2002)
Trade Paperback, 607 Pages, Poetry Anthology
ISBN: 9780805069860, US$20.00

ABCD Rating: ACQUIRE

“I like the straight crookedness of a good walking stick”
—Robert Frost

From the Cover: No poet is more emblematically American than Robert Frost. From “Birches” and “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” to “The Gift Outright” and “Directive,” his poems have refined and even defined our sense of what poetry is and what it can do. T.S. Eliot judged Frost to be “the most eminent, the most distinguished … Anglo-American poet now living.” Frost is the only poet ever to have been awarded four Pulitzer Prizes. Edward Connery Lathem, a Frost scholar and close friend of the poet, has scrupulously annotated the more than 350 poems in this volume. His notes include bibliographical information on the publication of the poems and specify the textual changes Frost himself made over the years. This authoritative collection has stood as the standard Frost compendium since its first publication in 1969.

My Review: The name “ROBERT FROST” has become so inextricably tied to the concept of American poetry, that to try and say something new about him could be the height of folly. I don’t even know that I am the right person to talk about Frost, because I am not really a student of poetry, let alone modern poetry. My field of so-called “expertise” lies in the contemporary/postmodern American novel. Frost is so far outside my realm of knowledge that reading his poetry in my Modern American Literature class was akin to delving into a foreign language.

Modernism—as a school of thought and writing—is so different than Postmodernism, that it took me a day or three to get my head wrapped around the fact that when Frost wrote his poems, he meant for his meaning to be clear, easy and simple to understand, and perhaps therein lies his appeal as an American poet. There is no deconstruction of the English language, no pretentious thought that the idea of a word is more important than the meaning of a word. (And the fact that I understand that sentence means that I am a Postmodern student and critic and not a student/critic of Modernism.) When Frost writes about birches, they are birches. Nothing else and that is, honestly, a little refreshing, if difficult to wrap my brain around.

Throughout Frost’s poetry he is looking for something as humble as a momentary stay against confusion. His poems attempt to act as a pause, a safe harbor in a turbulent and existentially confusing world. Chief among these are such poems as the well-known and almost clichéd (by now) “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening,” the sublime poem “Birches,” and the less well-known (and much better, in my opinion) “Directive.” They are poems of journey and pilgrimage, but not necessarily journeys that have an end. They are, instead, poems of journeys of renewal. The steps in “Directive” are ones to be taken as often as necessary in order to keep finding peace in life.

Others, like “Fire and Ice” are quintessentially Robert Frost in that they deal with weighty issues (in the case of “Fire and Ice” it is the End of the World) yet it is written like a home-spun homily that one would expect to find in Poor Richard’s Almanack. It deals with human hatred and passion and human indifference and apathy (especially relevant given the horrors of WWI that the Modernists would have seen and/or experienced) and how each of these qualities are equally destructive. Then, there are poems like “The Witch of Coös” are just plain fun. There are weighty elements to the “fun” poems (“Coös” deals with infidelity and murder and the covering up of one’s sins) but mostly, a poem like this one is just plain fun.

Poetry is still a very difficult subject for me, and I still prefer the contemporary American novel to modern poetry, but reading and studying and—most importantly—enjoying the poetry of Robert Frost has given me a new appreciation for the craft as a whole, and if you’re going to read the poetry of Robert Frost, why not get the “Complete and Unabridged” collection, so that you have everything the poet wrote at your fingertips and you can pick and choose and enjoy his entire œuvre at your leisure? I know that this will not be the last time I pick up this collection.

Common Sense and the CPSIA

I don’t know if you’ve heard or not, but common sense seems to have taken an extended vacation. The Consumer Product Improvement Act (CPSIA) was been written to try and keep lead out of all products that would end up in the hands of children 12-yeas-old and younger. That sounds okay on the face of it, after all, who wants to give their kid a toy with lead in it? The trouble is, as Heather Cushman-Dowdee so eloquently put it, “the law covers everything that is sold, made, or even MIGHT be used, by kids under 12. It all has to be tested. Paid for by the manufacturer. Do you love to buy handmade toys? Like to buy slings from a local company? Get your cloth diapers from other mothers off eBay? Support the craftspeople of Etsy? They are all scrambling right now, trying to figure out how this law will apply to them, how to possibly get around it, and ultimately how to pay for the testing. An expense that will be easily met by Mattel, but not so easily met by Grandma Ruth.” The problem is that Cushman-Dowdee’s interpretation is not an exaggeration. It is what the law is going to do if it is not rewritten before the February 10th deadline. Now, it seems, that this [EXPLITIVE DELETED] of a knee-jerk reactionary law has taken another turn. The following was taken from the ALA’s website and just goes to show that lawyers can suck the common sense out of just about anything (the portion in bold below is the official legal position of those responsible for the CPSIA, and is nothing short of mind-boggling):


WASHINGTON, D.C.—The American Library Association (ALA) today expressed dissatisfaction with a public meeting held by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to discuss the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) and whether the law, which requires children’s products to undergo stringent testing for lead, should apply to ordinary, paper-based children’s books.

Under the current opinion issued by the General Counsel of the CPSC, the law would apply to books for children under the age of 12; therefore, public, school, academic and museum libraries would be required to either remove all their children’s books or ban all children under 12 from visiting the facilities as of February 10, 2009.

During the meeting, members of a panel including representatives of the American Association of Publishers (AAP) as well as major book publishers and ink manufacturers, addressed questions raised by the CPSC rulemaking committee regarding the testing procedures and methodologies currently exercised in the production of an ordinary book.

The panel presented a collection of data reinforcing their position that ordinary books pose no inherent threat. This information can be viewed HERE. Though the CPSC acknowledged that the current deadlines are unrealistic and potentially damaging, the General Counsel gave no clear indication as to when an official ruling would be made and could offer no definite direction to libraries at this point.

“It is completely irresponsible and unacceptable for the CPSC to continue to leave this matter unresolved with the February 10th deadline drawing closer each day,” ALA President Jim Rettig said.

“It is apparent that the CPSC does not fully understand the ramifications this law will have for libraries—and for children—if libraries are not granted an exemption. At this point, we are advising libraries not to take drastic action, such as removing or destroying books, as we continue to hope this matter will be rectified and that the attention will be paid to the products that pose a true threat to children. However, we find it disappointing and shameful that a government agency would continue to leave this matter unsettled when clearly the outcome would virtually shut down our nation’s school and public libraries.”


If you are as OUTRAGED about this as I am (and I hope you are) I would urge you to contact your representatives in Congress and urge them to rewrite this law. They’ve been sitting on it for I don’t know how long, knowing FULL WELL what the law means as it stands written, and haven’t done a [EXPLITIVE DELETED] thing about it. Cushman-Dowdee has a sample letter you can copy and paste and send to your legislators HERE (it’s near the bottom of the post at the end of the second purple box), and you can find out who your Representative is (if you don’t know already) HERE and your Senators HERE. I can’t imagine that my Rep is going to do anything about this, but it doesn’t hurt to try.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Nice Work

by David Lodge
(New York: Penguin Books, 1990)
Trade Paperback, 277 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9780140133967, US$15.00

ABCD Rating: BACKLIST

From the Cover: Vic Wilcox, a self-made man and managing director of an engineering firm, has little regard for academics, and even less for feminists. So when Robyn Penrose, a trendy leftist teacher, is assigned to “shadow” Vic under a government program created to foster mutual understanding between town and gown, the hilarious collision of lifestyles and ideologies that ensues seems unlikely to foster anything besides mutual antipathy. But in the course of a bumpy year, both parties make some surprising discoveries about each other’s world—and about themselves.

My Reveiw: This semester I am taking a class on Contemporary British Literature and David Lodge’s Nice Work is the first novel that we read, and it is a very interesting one. A number of the blurbs in the book compare Lodge to Philip Roth, and I can kind of see the similarities, but the little bit of Roth that I have read was more serious and less “tongue-in-cheek” than what Lodge has created in Nice Work.

I enjoyed this book a lot, the intertextual allusions that Lodge uses to connect his book to its 19th Century counterparts are wonderful, and his characters, especially Vic and Robyn, are beautifully created, and as I said, I enjoyed this book a lot, until—that is—I got to the end. I understand that Lodge is working under certain conventions most notably those found in 19th Century “Condition of England” or “Industrial” novels) but by the time I got to the end of Nice Work, I felt that Lodge had painted himself into a corner and invoked not one, not two but three deus ex machinas in order to get himself out of the corner he wrote himself into. His characters don’t learn anything, all the growth that they have achieved in the previous chapters is gone and they even go so far as selling-out their principles—at least I thought so; I started a very heated argument in my class when I expressed this opinion—with Vic buying German instead of “England First” as is his mantra through the novel and Robyn giving into the lures of capitalism and money, which she railed against all through the novel.

Don’t get me wrong, though, this is a very good novel. Exceptional even. One of the best I’ve read this year, it’s just that I had some issues with the ending, but that doesn’t mean that you will; I mean, in a class of 30+ students I was the only one with these issues regarding the end. David Lodge’s Nice Work is a great book if you can get it.

Barack Obama's Book Club

Books, books, books. As you should know by know, books are my obsession. So, to now have a President that is so candid and open about reading and who is someone who obviously enjoys reading is a breath of fresh air. (Now, before you inundate me with emails, I know W read, but he was never really overt or open about it (except for The Pet Goat (though, as an aside, I won’t necessarily fault W for not stopping while reading to kindergarteners upon learning of the attacks in NYC and D.C. and will credit him for—intentionally or not—not panicking a group of children) and seemed to cultivate the “common man” attitude that “book-learnin’ is fer city folk.”) However, President Obama is a reader, and ABEBooks.com recently did a write-up on Obama’s Favorite Books:

The often repeated claim that Barack Obama will be America’s most bookish president is probably a little harsh on the 43 past residents of the White House. Recently Karl Rove, George W. Bush’s Deputy Chief of Staff from 2004 until 2007, revealed his boss read 95 books in 2006 and another 51 in 2007 but no-one is praising Mr. Bush’s devotion to the written word.

Still, Barack Obama is clearly an avid reader and literature has massively influenced his politics. He talks about books at the drop of a hat, is frequently seen with a book in his hand and, of course, has penned two worldwide bestsellers himself. He has won Grammys for the audio versions of both his books—Dreams from My Father and The Audacity of Hope. He even used book tour appearances designed to promote The Audacity of Hope as thinly-veiled political rallies to position himself as the next Democratic contender for the Presidency.

Books by him, about him or read by him sell. Signed copies of his books are now extremely collectible and in November AbeBooks.com sold a signed copy of Dreams from My Father for $5,500.

The last time someone from Chicago talked this much about literature we ended up with Oprah’s Book Club. Obama’s Book Club might be unofficial but it has influenced book sales for the past 12 months. What’s Barack Obama’s favorite book? is a common question posed on the Internet search engines every day.

In May, he was photographed carrying Fareed Zakaria’s The Post-American World as he walked across the tarmac at an airport in Bozeman, Montana. The book outlines America’s declining influence in international politics—was he formulating policies for dealing with rising powers like China, India and Brazil?

In October, the New York Times asked Obama to provide a list of books and writers that were significant to him. Here goes: Ralph Waldo Emerson, Thomas Jefferson, Mark Twain, Abraham Lincoln, James Baldwin, W. E. B. DuBois’ Souls of Black Folk, Martin Luther King’s Letter From Birmingham Jail, Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon, Graham Greene’s The Power and the Glory and The Quiet American, Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook, Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Cancer Ward, John Steinbeck’s In Dubious Battle, Robert Caro’s Power Broker, Studs Terkel’s Working, Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments, and also Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men—a novel about a corrupt Southern governor (Rod Blagojevich anyone?). And then there were his theology and philosophy influences—Friedrich Nietzsche, Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul Tillich.

He mentioned Morrison’s Song of Solomon many times during his Democratic and Presidential campaigns in 2008, including in an interview with Rolling Stone magazine where he listed Shakespeare and Ernest Hemingway’s For Whom The Bell Tolls as key influences (incidentally, John McCain also named For Whom The Bell Tolls as his favorite read). Herman Melville’s Moby Dick, E.L. Doctorow and Philip Roth have also cropped up in interviews. Parting the Waters by Taylor Branch—a Pulitzer Prize-winning book about Martin Luther King—is another favorite. With two young daughters—Malia and Sasha—to entertain, he’s read all seven of the Harry Potter books.

Once the votes were cast and he was Washington-bound, Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin became the Barack book of the moment. It describes how Abraham Lincoln brought his political enemies into his cabinet in order to harness their skills. A student of Honest Abe, Barack mentioned the book several times in interviews.

Later in November, he left his Chicago home carrying a hardcover copy of Lincoln: The Biography of a Writer by Fred Kaplan—clearly getting in some last-minute homework before beginning the process of naming his cabinet. In the same month, he was spotted carrying a copy of Derek Walcott’s Collected Poems 1948-1984. Poet Elizabeth Alexander, a close friend, is reading at his inauguration.

Apparently, Obama’s childhood was not particularly bookish but his love of literature was sparked at Occidental College in California where he admitted to reading “tons of books.” In December 1997, he even reviewed a book for the Chicago Tribune—William Ayers’ A Kind and Just Parent: The Children of the Juvenile Court.

What’s next? He won’t have time to write another book until his Presidency is over. Popping into a bookstore to pick up a new read is out of the question—his people will do that. Security briefing documents are now his must-read of the day rather than Morrison or another Lincoln biography. If George W. Bush can tick off 95 books in 2006, a year of unending international turmoil, then Barack Obama can surely read his way through the next four years.

Twilight (Audio)

read by Ilyana Kadushin
-Twilight Series, Book 1-
(New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2005)
MP3 Audiobook, 176.7 MB, 12.8 Hours, Young Adult Fiction
ISBN: 9780307280909, US$29.99

ABCD Rating: DITCH

“But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.”— Genesis 2:17

From the Cover: About three things I was absolutely positive. First, Edward was a vampire. Second, there was a part of him – and I didn’t know how dominant that part might be – that thirsted for my blood. And third, I was unconditionally and irrevocably in love with him.

My Review: So, here we are again: Stephenie Meyer and Twilight. Only this time, it’s the audio edition of Bella and Edward’s love story, and I have to say that I am not as enamored of the story as I was lo those many months ago. I’m not sure if it is the fact that the proverbial shine is off the apple, or if it is the reader, Ilyana Kadushin, but one way or another, it took me 40 days to slog through a twelve hour audiobook, and that has to be some kind of new record for me.

Since I brought up Kadushin, let’s talk about her performance for a little bit. Dreadful is a word that comes to mind. Boring, tedious, pedestrian and uninspired also all jump to the front, as well as all their synonyms. Kadushin sucks all the life and fun out of this book to the point that I am not sure that I want to finish the series in audio format (though I have started the audio edition of New Moon—ah, the things I do for you my small and sporadic readership). There is absolutely nothing redeeming about Kadushin’s reading of Meyer’s book, especially after having listened to Emily Bauer’s inspired reading of Susan Beth Pfeffer’s Life As We Knew It. If Little, Brown and Co. had contracted with Bauer to read this series, then … then there would be something to write home about. Bauer brought Life As We Knew It to ... well ... life and would have done the same to Twilight, however, stuck as we are with Kadushin, I guess the best that we, Loyal Audiobook Listeners, can do is put up with her mundane reading and try to find some joy in the series.

Though, even that is becoming harder and harder to do. Meyer’s obvious lack of writing skill (at least at this juncture in the series … it was her first book, after all, and Meyer is by no stretch of the imagination the Second Coming of Harper Lee) is only accentuated by the reading aloud of the novel. The dialogue falls flat and sounds stilted (though whether that is Meyer’s fault of Kadushin’s is up for debate), the trite phrases and sheer level of genre cheese stand out and the plot seems so contrived and mechanical that I, for one, wondered what I saw in the book in the first place.

Even the characters, who I extolled in my review of the print edition, seemed less vibrant and more artificial—less like real people and more like tropes or clichés created to fill pre-molded roles in the plot; though again, whether that is truly a fault of Meyer’s or more a result of Kadushin’s dreadful performance is up for considerable debate, and given my reaction to the novel in October 2007, I’d tend to side on it being the fault of Kadushin, and not necessarily a defect of Meyer’s writing, flawed though it may be.

I don’t know that I would even say that this is an audiobook for diehard fans only, because I believe (knowing a few diehard fans as I do) that even the most ardent Twilighter (did I just coin a new phrase?) would be dismayed and disheartened by Kadushin’s performance (and at least one Twilighter I know was). So, unless you absolutely have to hear Twilight read aloud, give this audiobook a wide berth and go back to the print edition. Your fandom will thank you for it.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Happy Birthday Mr. Poe


Today is the 200th anniversary of the birth of Edgar Allen Poe. He is—perhaps—one of my top 10 favorite authors. (He’s up there with the likes of Sherman Alexie, Stephen King and Don DeLillo.) If you haven’t read any Poe, that is a fact that you need to remedy, my friends. His short fiction and poems are absolutely brilliant and are guaranteed to leave you chilled to the bone. Start with “The Black Cat,” “The Tell-Tale Heart,” “The Masque of the Red Death,” “The Fall of the House of Usher,” “The Pit and the Pendulum“ and my personal favorite “The Cask of Amontillado“ and go on from there. I’ll get you started and you’re your appetite with the text of his famous poem “The Raven.” Or, if you prefer, you can listen to James Earl Jones read it HERE.

Happy Birthday Mr. Poe
and thanks for all the goosebumps!

“The Raven”
Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore,
While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.
“’Tis some visitor,” I muttered, “tapping at my chamber door—
Only this, and nothing more.”

Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.
Eagerly I wished the morrow;—vainly I had sought to borrow
From my books surcease of sorrow—sorrow for the lost Lenore—
For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels named Lenore—
Nameless here for evermore.

And the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtain
Thrilled me—filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before;
So that now, to still the beating of my heart, I stood repeating
“’Tis some visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door—
Some late visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door;—
This it is, and nothing more,”

Presently my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
“Sir,” said I, “or Madam, truly your forgiveness I implore;
But the fact is I was napping, and so gently you came rapping,
And so faintly you came tapping, tapping at my chamber door,
That I scarce was sure I heard you”—here I opened wide the door;—
Darkness there, and nothing more.

Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing,
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before
But the silence was unbroken, and the darkness gave no token,
And the only word there spoken was the whispered word, “Lenore!”
This I whispered, and an echo murmured back the word, “Lenore!”
Merely this and nothing more.

Back into the chamber turning, all my soul within me burning,
Soon again I heard a tapping somewhat louder than before.
“Surely,” said I, “surely that is something at my window lattice;
Let me see then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore—
Let my heart be still a moment and this mystery explore;—
’Tis the wind and nothing more!”

Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately raven of the saintly days of yore.
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door—
Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door—
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.

Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
“Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,” I said, “art sure no craven.
Ghastly grim and ancient raven wandering from the nightly shore—
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night’s Plutonian shore!”
Quoth the raven, “Nevermore.”

Much I marvelled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,
Though its answer little meaning—little relevancy bore;
For we cannot help agreeing that no living human being
Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his chamber door—
Bird or beast above the sculptured bust above his chamber door,
With such name as “Nevermore.”

But the raven, sitting lonely on the placid bust, spoke only,
That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.
Nothing further then he uttered—not a feather then he fluttered—
Till I scarcely more than muttered “Other friends have flown before—
On the morrow he will leave me, as my hopes have flown before.”
Then the bird said, “Nevermore.”

Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,
“Doubtless,” said I, “what it utters is its only stock and store,
Caught from some unhappy master whom unmerciful disaster
Followed fast and followed faster till his songs one burden bore—
Till the dirges of his hope that melancholy burden bore
Of “Never-nevermore.”

But the raven still beguiling all my sad soul into smiling,
Straight I wheeled a cushioned seat in front of bird and bust and door;
Then, upon the velvet sinking, I betook myself to linking
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore—
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking “Nevermore.”

This I sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing
To the fowl whose fiery eyes now burned into my bosom’s core;
This and more I sat divining, with my head at ease reclining
On the cushion’s velvet lining that the lamp-light gloated o’er,
But whose velvet violet lining with the lamp-light gloating o’er,
She shall press, ah, nevermore!

Then, methought, the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer
Swung by Seraphim whose foot-falls tinkled on the tufted floor.
“Wretch,” I cried, “thy God hath lent thee—by these angels he has sent thee
Respite—respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Lenore!
Quaff, oh quaff this kind nepenthe, and forget this lost Lenore!”
Quoth the raven, “Nevermore.”

“Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil!—prophet still, if bird or devil!—
Whether tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,
Desolate yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted—
On this home by horror haunted—tell me truly, I implore—
Is there—is there balm in Gilead?—tell me—tell me, I implore!”
Quoth the raven, “Nevermore.”

“Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil!—prophet still, if bird or devil!
By that Heaven that bends above us—by that God we both adore—
Tell this soul with sorrow laden if, within the distant Aidenn,
It shall clasp a sainted maiden whom the angels named Lenore—
Clasp a rare and radiant maiden, whom the angels named Lenore?”
Quoth the raven, “Nevermore.”

“Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!” I shrieked upstarting—
“Get thee back into the tempest and the Night’s Plutonian shore!
Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul hath spoken!
Leave my loneliness unbroken!—quit the bust above my door!
Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!”
Quoth the raven, “Nevermore.”

And the raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting
On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door;
And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon’s that is dreaming,
And the lamp-light o’er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;
And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor
Shall be lifted—Nevermore!

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Confessions of a Twilight Fanboy

Now, I know that I have gushed about the Twilight phenomenon in the past, and I fully admit that I am (was?) a fanboy about the whole thing (and had a smallish book-crush on Alice). However, listening to the audiobook edition of Book One has given me a new perspective on the series (we’ll discuss it when I finish). That, and working with seventh and eighth grade fangirls five days a week. Anyway, the following is from GraphJam and is, unfortunately, all too true in many cases.

Monday, January 05, 2009

Ghost Story

(New York: Pocket Books, 1980)
Paperback, 567 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9780671441982, US$3.95

ABCD Rating: ACQUIRE

What’s the worst thing you’ve ever done?
I won’t tell you that, but I’ll tell you the worst thing that ever happened to me … the most dreadful thing …

From the Cover: Everyone has been afraid, sometime. Everyone has felt fear close a cold hand around the heart, tug at the scalp and send the blood racing wildly. Everyone has been afraid. But none so afraid as the terror-stricken men and women of Millburn. Called by a supernatural force to answer for a supernatural sin. Sentenced in the evil heart of darkness to live out a Ghost Story.

My Review: In an online forum I belong to someone started a thread asking for spoilers to Peter Straub’s Ghost Story. It seems that they started the book but then got so spooked that they couldn’t finish it. Well, I had just finished reading The King in Yellow and so thought, why not? and picked up Ghost Story for myself. I had read it for the first time a couple of years ago and remember being spooked by it, and since I love me a good scary book I felt it was time to read Straub’s novel again.

I have not been disappointed.

I could not put the book down. I have—almost literally—been reading non-stop since late Friday-early Saturday, and now, even though it is well past my bedtime and I have to get up early to go back to work for the first time in two weeks, here I sit, writing this review in order to get my impressions fresh onto the page after having just finished the book. What are those impressions? Simply put, there is a reason that Ghost Story catapulted Peter Straub to fame. This is, without a doubt, one of the most unsettling and chilling novels I have ever read … and I read Jack Ketchum. Straub’s story evokes so much in its simple prose and elegant plot that I dare you to not be sucked into this story.

Then there are the scares. Ghost Story has some of the scariest images and scenes that I have found to date in the horror genre. Gregory and Fenny Bates are among the most frightening characters ever imagined, and the scene on Christmas Eve night at the Scales’ farm rivals the morgue scene in Stephen King’s ‘Salem’s Lot. I will never look out my window at the snow-covered backyard the same ever again!

Straub has certainly created something powerful in this story, and if you are looking for something to read on these long winter nights as the snow falls and the wind whistles around your eaves, might I humbly suggest Ghost Story. You’ll sleep with all the lights on for weeks after finishing. I guarantee it.

Saturday, January 03, 2009

The King in Yellow

by Robert W. Chambers
(New York: ACE Books, 1895)
Paperback, 274 Pages, Short Fiction Anthology
ISBN: N/A, US$1.50

ABCD Rating: BACKLIST

The King in Yellow remains today a masterpiece of its kind, and with the work of Poe and Bierce, shares the distinction of having contributed to the famed Cthulhu mythos of H.P. Lovecraft.” —August Derleth

From the Cover: Ten of the most frightening and macabre stories ever conceived—horrific visions from the pits of human consciousness … unforgettable flights of fantastic imagination—this is the thrilling essence from which Robert W. Chambers fashioned The King in Yellow. When first published, it was at once recognized as a masterpiece that could only have been written by a genius of the highest order; Chambers was compared to Edgar Allen Poe, and his book became a bestseller. This reputation, this force, and the horrors he conjured up have not diminished.

This collection contains the following stories: “The Repairer of Reputations,” “The Mask,” “In the Court of the Dragon,” “The Yellow Sign,” “The Demoiselle D’Ys,” “The Prophets’ Paradise,” “The Street of the Four Winds,” “The Street of the First Shell,” “The Street of Our Lady of the Fields,” and “Rue Barrée.”

My Review: Stephen King has cited this book as an influence, as has H.P. Lovecraft and some of the other luminaries in the horror pantheon, so I picked it up and excitedly started to read. The first four stories in this collection are quite good and are what I consider to be Gothic or Victorian horror, especially “The Repairer of Reputations” which has a queer sort of madness and urgency that is disturbing. The over-arcing motif of a play (The King in Yellow) that drives the reader insane is nothing short of brilliant. I was with Chambers every step of the way through those four stories.

The next, “The Demoiselle D’Ys,” was a nice little ghost story that, while the twist has been overdone in contemporary writing, for 1895, I’m sure it was quite startling and new, and as such the story as a whole works very well. Four of the last five are simply artists in love in Paris stories that while well-written and “nice” had a hard time holding my interest … they simply were not what I was expecting out of a book with the reputation that The King in Yellow has. That fifth story, though, “The Street of the First Shell,” is a dark and prophetic little piece about a war between the Prussians (Germans) and the French and Americans in 1920 (Chambers is writing in 1895, remember, nearly two decades before World War I) and the story describes the siege and bombing of Paris by the Prussian forces and the counterattack by the French and American forces, and its impact on a small band of American art students in the Latin Quarter at the time. Very chilling, especially given the prophetic nature of the story.

Over all, I think—perhaps—my expectations for this book were a little too high, and so I am let down by that … and I have a hard time seeing where August Derleth comes from when he says that this book contributed to Lovecraft’s Cthulhu mythos. Either I missed something in Chambers’ writing, or I don’t know the Cthulhu mythos as well as I think I do (and I’m willing to bet that it is the latter of two, and not the first). All in all, the first four stories are not to be missed—especially “The Repairer of Reputations”—and if you continue on, make sure you catch “The Street of the First Shell.”

Thursday, January 01, 2009

New Year's Resolutions

My reading goal for 2008 was 100 books. I read 111 books. Not too shabby if I do say so myself. My new goal for 2009 is: