Monday, August 31, 2009

How to Survive a Robot Uprising: Tips on Defending Yourself Against the Coming Rebellion (Audio)

read by Stefan Rudnicki
(Ashland: Blackstone Audio, 2006)
MP3 Audiobook, 42.2 MB, 3 Hours, Survival Guide
ISBN: 9780786171484, US$27.00

ABCD Rating: BACKLIST

“You probably found How to Survive a Robot Uprising in the humor section. Let us hope that that is where it belongs.”

From the Cover: How do you spot a robot mimicking a human? How do you recognize and deactivate a rebel servant robot? How do you escape a murderous “smart” house, or evade a swarm of marauding robotic flies? In this dryly hilarious survival guide, roboticist Daniel H. Wilson teaches worried humans the secrets to quashing a robot mutiny. From treating laser wounds to fooling face and speech recognition, outwitting robot logic to engaging in hand-to-pincer combat, How to Survive a Robot Uprising covers every possible doomsday scenario facing the newest endangered species: humans. Based on extensive interviews with prominent scientists and including a thorough overview of cutting edge robot prototypes like humanoid walkers, insect, gecko, and snake robots, this one-of-a-kind audiobook makes a witty yet legitimate introduction to contemporary robotics.

The book’s official website can be found HERE.

My Review: You know those books that you pick up on a whim because it looks like it’ll be a lark, and then when you’re done with it you’ve not only had a good laugh, but it has been informative as well? How to Survive a Robot Uprising is one of those books. I got it for no other reason than it looked like it would be a fun read. After all, I had enjoyed Max Brooks’ Zombie Survival Guide and this looked like it would be in the same vein.

It was, and I learned quite a bit about robotics in the process. Wilson (who received his PhD in robotics from Carnegie Mellon University) walks the reader through what is possible, what is being developed, and what is theoretical in the field of robotics today. It is very informative and quite fascinating, the things that robots can and will be able to do. Sure, he gives some survival tips in the process like learn to hide your heat signature from an IR robot’s sensors, and what to do in case your smart home turns against you (make sure you have a “safe” room with no electronics, and plenty of supplies) but really, the star of the first two-thirds of the book is the robotic theories that Wilson expounds upon.

That, then, brings us to the final third of the book in which Wilson lays out how robots could, theoretically, take over the world and what you should do about it: establish a safe location away from the robots, find other survivors and then bend together and fight back. Of course, that’s not all there is to it, but if I were to give you any more information, then you would have just as good a chance at surviving as I and my family would, and we can’t have that now, can we? After all, there will be a limited number of resources available in the event of such a rebellion and if you’re around, that means less for us. (Plus, this review is going out on the internet, and in the event of an uprising, we don’t want to robots to have access to too much information on how we plan on fighting back … though it just occurred to me that Wilson’s book is available for electronic download from such places as iTunes and Audible.com, so it may already be too late.)

As for Rudnicki, his basso profundo voice is perfect for narrating Wilson’s book, though, thinking back on it, how are we to really know that Rudnicki is Rudnicki? After all, one of the signs of a robot posing as a human—according to Wilson—is a lack of emotion, and Rudnicki is fairly emotionless in his delivery, adding only a certain wryness to his reading from time to time, so … maybe the robots have already begun their rebellion. Or is that paranoid talk?

This book is a great addition to any library, audio or in print … though you may want to pick up the print copy, just in case the robots do rebel…

Friday, August 28, 2009

'salem's Lot (Audio): Redux

read by Ron McLarty
(New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 2004)
MP3 Audiobook, 868.2 MB, 17½ Hours, Fiction
ISBN: 9780743536967, US$59.95

ABCD Rating: ACQUIRE

From the Cover: A dark wind is blowing into Jerusalem’s Lot, Maine, in the guise of antique furniture dealers R.T. Straker and Kurt Barlow. Novelist Benjamin Mears has returned to the village near Portland to exorcise his childhood demons. Immediately, townspeople begin suffering from strange flu symptoms, or disappearing altogether. Mears and local high school teacher Matt Burke understand the peril the town faces. Soon they’re joined by an artist, a doctor, an alcoholic priest, and an 11-year old boy, forming a modern-day team of vampire hunters.

My Original Review: 11/22/2005 – 08:50:00 PM

My Redux Review: Stephen King’s ‘salem’s Lot is a story that holds a lot nostalgia and fond memories for me. It was one of the first novels I ever owned, it was the first Stephen King story I ever read at the tender age of eleven (with the blessing of my Mother though—looking back—I have no idea what she was thinking when she okayed that, I don’t think I’d let my son read it when he turns eleven), and it is one that even now never fails to induce chills and thrills. I have even used it to make arguments for my ever-evolving academic paper on passive-sexism in Stephen King’s The Shining (showing how ‘salem’s Lot is a kind of “run up” to what he does in The Shining).

I find so much about ‘salem’s Lot to be so very fascinating, that it is difficult to know where to start. Well, perhaps it is best to start with something small. This time through the book I was struck by just how dated ‘salem’s Lot is. It really is a relic from the early- to mid-1970s when it was written. So much of the novel is so outdated that I found myself wondering just how well Mssrs. Barlow and Straker would fair if they were to plunk down in Jerusalem’s Lot in an era of cell phones and the internet. This is addressed, somewhat, in the 2004 TV miniseries which is, all things considered, not a bad adaptation, given the problems of updating such material. Still, as I said, I am struck at just how dated the book is.

Another “theme” of the novel (for lack of a better word) that I have been dealing with (mostly because it jives with my paper on Stephen King) is just how passively sexist the works of Stephen King are, and ‘salem’s Lot is no exception. In fact, it is a pretty good example of what I am talking about. Two characters come to mind as I have run this through my mind: Susan Norton, of course, and Bonnie Sawyer. Susan is, to all appearances, a pretty “liberated” and “strong” female figure, holding her own with man and vampire alike, and yet, looking a little deeper she is a “shackled” character; very one-dimensional when compared to the male characters in the novel. She plays little more than the role of girlfriend and tragic victim. Susan makes some very poor decision in the course of the novel (the kind that would have you shouting DON’T GO DOWN THERE to the screen if this were a movie) and as a result of these decisions (and, I would argue, due to King’s indifference to his female characters) she pays the price.

The same could be said for the character of Bonnie Sawyer, a bit player in the overall drama, but one that King keeps coming back to. She is the “Jezebel” character type; the “wanton woman” who is having an affair with a younger man, but when they are caught by her husband, she is literally beaten into submission and—as King puts it—raped by her husband regularly, until their end comes in the final third of the book. I bring up their characters because they both are women who initially seem liberated and in control of their destinies, but ultimately are brought down by their inability to listen to the male authorities in their lives (in the case of Susan it is Matt Burke and Ben Mears and even the teenage Mark Petrie whom she ignores, and for Bonnie, of course, it is her husband whom she disobeys) and as a result they are brought to ruin.

This passive-sexism (as I’ve chosen to call it) and assertion of male dominance (culminating in the staking of the vampiric Susan (which Freud would undoubtedly call “phallic” and a violent sexual act in and of itself, a rape of a kind) and the beating and raping of Bonnie Sawyer) really show King’s true colors as a closet-conservative in spite of all his trappings and claims of open-mindedness and liberalism. He falls back on the conservative world view whenever a female comes into the pages of his novels (they are usually either a milquetoast hausfrau or a wanton jezebel) that bucks the male authority structure and have to be either saved or dispatched (in the case of Susan, they come to one and the same). It is true of Susan Norton and Bonnie Sawyer in ‘salem’s Lot, it is true of Wendy Torrance in The Shining, it is true of Rose Daniels in Rose Madder, it is true of Emily in “The Gingerbread Girl” and it is true of Lisey Landon in Lisey’s Story.

But enough theorizing. In spite of these “flaws” (for lack of a better word) I still think that ‘salem’s Lot is one of Stephen King’s finest, and is certainly in the Top 5 of my favorite King books. King has crafted a very believable world in ‘salem’s Lot, one that is described as Peyton Place meets Dracula, and I think that that is a pretty fair assessment. It is hard to imagine which the greater evil in the township is: the external force of Barlow and his vampirism, or the internal forces of the town and its small-town insularism. King has stated in interviews that ‘salem’s Lot was written at a time of great social and political upheaval: the Ellsberg break-in, Nixon’s tapes and enemies’ list, Liddy and the CIA, Watergate, the invasive federal investigations of war protestors, Vietnam … and so it is no wonder that these feelings of paranoia bled over (no pun intended) into ‘salem’s Lot and informed the novel; paranoia of vampires, paranoia of outsiders, paranoia of the unknown, paranoia of the future … it’s all there in the pages, and makes for one hell of an atmospheric novel.

Atmospheric and arguably one of the scariest of King’s tales (his early ones are so much better than his later). I’ve mentioned it in my prior review of this audiobook, but the scenes with Mike Ryerson in Matt Burke’s house (both times) and then the scene with Marjorie Glick’s body in the mortuary are some of the scariest scenes that have even been penned. They never fail to give me the chills (and this time around, it didn’t help that I was listening to the Marjorie Glick scene as I was taking a late night walk to clear my head after a stressful day and as a thunderstorm passed overhead, I have to admit that I looked over my shoulder more than once as I walked the storm-darkened streets).

Also, what makes this such a great audiobook is Ron McLarty’s reading. If you have never experienced a book read by Ron McLarty you need to, and ‘salem’s Lot is as good a place as any to start. It is amazing how much the story comes to life in McLarty’s capable hands. It really brings an already great book to an even more sublime level.

You don’t have to be a Stephen King fan to enjoy ‘salem’s Lot, and since vampires are very much in vogue right now, take the time to listen to (or read) a real vampire story. Yes, it borrows heavily from Dracula (with Matt Burke playing Van Helsing, Susan playing Lucy Westenra and Mina Harker, Dr. Cody as Dr. Seward, Ben Mears playing Arthur Holmwood and Jonathan Harker, Straker as Renfield and, of course, Barlow as the Count) but I would say that that is intentional, since the idea behind ‘salem’s Lot was what would happen if Count Dracula came to America and settled not in New York City (where, in King’s words, he’d “be killed by a taxi cab like, Margaret Mitchell in Atlanta”) but in rural, small-town Maine.

It is a question that I think King has answered well. As I said, in spite of its “flaws” ‘salem’s Lot is a stellar novel and one that every vampire groupie needs to have under their belt, and if you’re going to try it, why not pick up the audio edition, since Ron McLarty’s reading is nothing short of amazing.

The Friday 56: Right is Wrong

The Friday 56 is hosted by Storytime with Tonya and Friends
RULES
  1. Grab the book nearest you. Right now.
  2. Turn to page 56.
  3. Find the fifth sentence.
  4. Post that sentence (plus one or two others if you like).
  5. Post a link with your post to Storytime (and here on Bryan’s Book Blog, I’d like to know what book you’ve got at hand).
This week, the nearest book to hand was one of my wife’s library finds, Right is Wrong: How the Lunatic Fringe Hijacked America, Shredded the Constitution, and Made Us All Less Safe (and What You Need to Know to End the Madness) by Arianna Huffington, and opening to page 56, the fifth sentence reads as follows:
“It’s no secret why the arbiters of conventional wisdom get so defensive when these kinds of questions are raised: their opinions helped lead to the war in Iraq, so anytime the conventional wisdom is threatened, they rise in its defense” (56).
In the immortal words of Homer Simpson: “As true today, as it was when it was written.”

Friday Finds: August 28, 2009

Friday Finds (hosted by Should Be Reading)

What great books did you hear about/discover this past week?
Share with us your FRIDAY FINDS!

Don’t have much time to blather on about these finds, other than to say that how could you go wrong with Don of the Dead? Zombies and the mafia, at the risk of a bad pun, talk about a lethal combination! Darling Jim has been recommended to me by a number of people, I am currently knee deep in Darwinia and loving it, Deathtroopers sounds too good to be true: zombies in Imperial space? (Plus, don’t you just love that cover!) Cannot wait for October, and how do you not fall in love with a book with a title like How to Survive a Robot Uprising: Tips on Defending Yourself Against the Coming Rebellion? Pure gold!

Darling Jim by Christian Moerk
Deathtroopers by Joe Schreiber

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Booking Through Thursday: Mmmmm... Fluffiness

Well, another Thursday is upon us, and that means it is time for yet another Booking Through Thursday prompt. What will it be this week, you ask? Here you go…


Prompt: What’s the lightest, most “fluff” kind of book you’ve read lately?


Without a doubt, the fluffiest, lightest, most meringue-esque book I’ve read lately is hands down:

Dead Until Dark
-Southern Vampire Mysteries Series, Book 1-
(New York: Penguin Books, 2001)
Paperback, 292 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9780441008537, US$7.99

I found absolutely nothing of substance in this book … it is brain fluff, pure and simple brain fluff.

Until next Thursday…

Indiana Jones and the Seven Veils

by Rob MacGregor
-Indiana Jones Series, Book 3-

(New York: Bantam Books, 1991)
Paperback, 291 Pages, Fiction
ISBN:
9780553293340, US$4.99

ABCD Rating: BACKLIST

From the Cover: Having barely survived a hair-raising archaeological dig in Tikal, Guatemala, Indiana Jones has returned to New York just in time to get caught up in a controversy. The mysterious writings of Colonel Percy Fawcett, a missing British explorer, have turned up, and what they describe could revolutionize history—and make or break several scientific reputations, for Percy paints a tantalizing picture of a lost city in the Brasilian jungle and a mythical red-headed race who may be the descendents of ancient Celtic Druids. … No one loves mystery or adventure more than Indiana Jones. So with his trusty bullwhip in hand and the lovely Deirdre Campbell firmly in tow, he sets out for the wilds of the Amazon. But Indy has more enemies than he knows, including a bunch of hard-nosed thugs and a cannibalistic Indian tribe who are out to make him instant history. And if he survives what they throw his way, there’s still the fabled city itself … where the inhabitants practice the magic of the “seven veils” and no one leaves alive!

My Review: I first heard about this book when I was listening to David Grann read his book The Lost City of Z. In Z, Grann mentions the impact that Colonel Fawcett has had on popular culture, including—most notably—Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Lost World and Indiana Jones. Grann mentioned that in 1991, Indy was able to “meet” his progenitor in Rob MacGregor’s novel Indiana Jones and the Seven Veils, in which a reluctant Indy is pressed into finding Colonel Fawcett and the Lost City of Z by Marcus Brody. Adventure ensues. I was captivated by the story of Colonel Fawcett, one that reads like a great Hollywood cliffhanger serial, and with the possibility of Indiana Jones thrown in for good measure, it was all too good to pass up, so I order a copy of The Seven Veils and now, here we are.

That is not to say that I did not have some trepidation as I picked the book up and started to read. It is, after all, based on a film character, and often novels like this fall flat … being but poor imitations of their silver screen counterparts, with the film novelization being one of the worst types of books to be written. However, The Seven Veils starts off with typical Indy flair … on a dig in a booby-trapped temple in Guatemala where Indy soon finds himself surrounded by incompetent superiors, grave robbers, and a damsel in distress. From there he is catapulted into the hunt for Colonel Fawcett, and the action is pretty much non-stop.

With a few exceptions, the book has a fairly blistering pace that compels the Reader to want to read “just one more page.” MacGregor does a fine job of making Indy and Marcus (the only two characters from the films to make appearances) similar enough to their film counterparts while making the characters his own; make no mistake, that is a fine line to walk, and one that has sunk better authors than MacGregor. Also, there are some great additions to the cast, most notably Deirdre Campbell who is every bit as spunky and resourceful as Karen Allen’s Marion Ravenwood (from Raiders of the Lost Ark and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull).

For the most part I thoroughly enjoyed this book. It is every bit as exciting and engaging and thrilling as any of the Indiana Jones films. There were a few aspects, in particular the book seems to become a completely new story once Indy and Deirdre find Colonel Fawcett and the Lost City, more supernatural and “spacey,” like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, that I did not like—I prefer my Indy to be a little more historical (like the Ark of the Covenant, the Cult of Kali and the Holy Grail) and a little less New Age-y (like crystal skulls and lost Atlanteans) but, as I said, on the whole, this is a delightful adventure novel and a lot of fun; perfect for the end of summer as I get ready to head back to the world of academia.

Also, as one last endorsement for this book: Indiana Jones and the Seven Veils is book three in a twelve book series that predates the films (so, coming before Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom) and I fully intend to get my hands on the remaining eleven. It is a fun book, and looks like it will be a fun series.

And with that, I leave you with this in parting:



Wednesday, August 26, 2009

A-Z Wednesday: Contingency Cannibalism: Superhardcore Survivalism's Dirty Little Secret

A-Z Wednesday is yet another little book meme that I will be participating in in an effort to get me to think more about this blog. A-Z Wednesday is hosted by Reading at the Beach.

Here are the rules:

Go to your stack of books and find one whose title starts with the Letter of the Week.
Post:
  1. A Photo of the Book
  2. Title and Synopsis
  3. A link (Amazon, B&N, etc.)
  4. Come back here and leave your link in the comments
If you’ve already reviewed this book, post a link to the review as well. Be sure to visit other participants to see what books they have posted and leave them a comment (we all love comments, don’t we?) Who know? You may find your next “favorite” book.

THIS WEEK’S LETTER IS: C

My “C” Book is:

Contingency Cannibalism: Superhardcore Survivalism’s Dirty Little Secret
by Shiguro Takada
(Boulder: Paladin Press, 1999)
Paperback, 151 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9781581600254, US$20.00

From the Cover: Let’s cut the crap. Survivalism is not about niceties and polite topics. It’s about desperately fighting for your life in a hostile environment, where you are forced to make disturbing, dirty choices in order to live to see the next sunrise. And practicing cannibalism is the survivalist’s ultimate test of his will to live. Contingency Cannibalism is a twisted, morbid, tongue-in-cheek, and hilarious look at cannibalism as a last-resort survival option. Pulling no punches, it answers such pressing questions as:

  • Does it taste like chicken?
  • What will my friends and family say?
  • Will I get a disease?
  • What if I like it?
Author Shiguro Takada analyzes real-life case studies of determined survivors who bravely engaged in cannibalism to save their hides, including the infamous Donner Party, the Uruguayan rugby team stranded in the Andes Mountains, and homicidal “mountain guide” Alferd Packer. He also dissects historical episodes of wide-scale cannibalism practiced in Scotland, Mexico, China, Russia and Africa for vital lessons on how not to practice contingency cannibalism. Finally Takada serves up the hard-core decisions and gruesome details one must know in order to partake in this grisly but sometimes necessary practice. Doing exactly what it takes to survive in the worst of times is not for the squeamish, but the bottom line is it produces survivors. Read this book and find out if you have what it takes.

Recipes included.

FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY!

My Thoughts: I think I have mentioned it here on this blog before (but if not, I know I have mentioned it here before), but I have a very scholarly and deep fascination with the act of cannibalism. It is one of the last great taboos in our Western societies and one that even the most hardened look upon with disgust. It is a staple in the horror genre, and it seems every five years or so a story pops up in the news about somebody eating somebody else. (Remember Jeffrey Dahmer? Or the German who advertised for a victim online? Or the Craigslist Cannibal?)

So, after reading Nathaniel Philbrick’s In the Heart of the Sea: The Tragedy of the Whaleship Essex which details the story of the survivors of the Essex wreck who resort to cannibalism in order to survive after their ship is sunk by a sperm whale, and seeing that he referenced a book called Contingency Cannibalism, I knew I had to have the book on my shelf.

I haven’t read it cover-to-cover yet (I’ll probably be picking up shortly, after our move), but I have flipped through it, and I have to say that I am excited to read it, based on what I’ve seen, which includes a butcher’s chart of the human body, how to build a “Long Pig Smokehouse,” several recipes including how to cure “Sam Ham and Bacon,” “Jerk Jerky,” “Hobo Pocket Stew” as well as what wines go with human flesh.

It really promises to be an … interesting … read, and probably one that not a lot of people have on their shelves.

Moderately Confused, by Jeff Stahler, August 26, 2009

We can only hope that this does not prove prophetic...

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

POST 600: Why Have a Library of Books in the Home?

Wow! 600 posts. And they said it would never last. Also, we’re coming up on the fourth anniversary of Bryan’s Book Blog, but we’ll burn that bridge when we come to it next month.

As I started kicking around ideas to celebrate six-hundred posts, I had an interesting question posed to me by one of my brothers-in-law about a month ago. He IM’d me on Facebook one night, and we spent the next hour or so discussing the following question:

Why is a library of books so important to have in a home?

I was honestly flabbergasted for a couple of moments. Books are such an integral part of my life, and always have been, and reading is second-nature to me. If I don’t have a book in my hand (or close to hand) I’m probably showering … and even then there is a book on the back of the toilet. I “read” when I’m driving. A very dear friend introduced me to the wonders of the audiobook seven or eight years ago and I haven’t looked back since. I am a literary studies major, and have always wanted to teach books in one form or another (be it high school English since my sophomore year or my most recent educational goal: getting my Masters and then my Doctorate and teaching college literature classes somewhere).

I understand that reading is not for everyone … especially not pleasure or leisure reading. I know that for my brother-in-law reading takes a backseat to other interests. That’s fine, I don’t hold that against him. While I was working as an assistant teacher the last three years, working at a local charter school with seventh and eighth graders, I found that many of these kids were not readers. Quite a few of them had to be dragged kicking and screaming to read, and it wasn’t like we were reading dull books: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, the short stories of Edgar Allen Poe, The Call of the Wild by Jack London, Animal Farm by George Orwell, Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, and Harper Lee’s phenomenal To Kill a Mockingbird, to name just a few.

I grew up in a family of readers. My parents read (and still read) quite a bit. My brother reads and so do my sisters (one more than the other, but there you go). I am far and away the most prolific reader in the family, but that’s because as a child (and even a teenager) I was a bit antisocial. I had friends, but not friends that I went out and hung out with. I was involved in extracurricular activities but my proclivities tended toward drama and journalism. I never went to the high school football games except occasionally (usually when the photographer for the school paper couldn’t make it and I needed to step in) I went to few school dances (other than the big ones like the Winter Ball and the Senior Prom) and most Friday night and weekends you could find me curled up on the couch or in bed reading.

Reading was my solace. Reading was escapism. I had been reading on my own since I was five-years-old and never looked back. When I was young, the television was never on in the evenings, and my mother would read to me each night. We read a lot books in my formidable years: the “Mary Poppins” series by P.L. Travers, the “Doctor Doolittle” series by Hugh Lofting, Thirty-One Brothers and Sisters (and it’s sequel Forty-One Aunts and Uncles) by Reba P. Mirsky, the “Winnie-the-Pooh” series by A.A. Milne, Charlotte’s Web and Stuart Little by E.B. White and the books of Roald Dahl: The Fantastic Mr. Fox, James and the Giant Peach, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator, etc. etc. etc.

As it stands now, I have amassed quite library. At its peak it was over 1700 books strong, although that number has come down in the last month or so as I cull through the books in order to shrink my collection so that it will all fit in the UHaul trailer as we head to grad school at the end of the month. It’s been a harrowing experience, getting rid of so many books, but it is something that needs to be done, painful as it is. I’ve kept the essentials, but I still feel that somehow my library is suffering from the loss of so many good books.

All this is a long way to go around the barn to explain why I was so stunned by my brother-in-law’s question. Books are such a part of me and my life and the life of my wife, son and daughter that to ask why it is important to have books in the home took me by surprise.

After my initial shock wore off, I went about answering his initial question (and his subsequent follow-ups) in a back-and-forth that was really quite fun and engaging to participate in. My answers to WHY IS A LIBRARY OF BOOKS SO IMPORTANT TO HAVE IN A HOME? ran along these lines:


Books and Reading Promote Intelligence
Reading makes you smarter. It is as simple as that, and the more you read the smarter you get. There is something in the act of reading a book (be it fiction or nonfiction) that engages the Reader in a way that television and movies do not. Even so-called education television such as can be found on the Discovery Channel or the History Channel (much as I love those networks) pales in comparison to the knowledge one can get while reading a book. I think that this is because when most people watch television, you are usually doing something else. You are online chatting with a friend. You are checking your email. You are doing a crossword puzzle in the paper. You are playing with your kids. In other words, your attention is divided between the television and what you are doing. When you read a book it is (usually) a focusing and one-on-one experience between the words on the page and you. You absorb more when reading than when you watch TV or a movie. Of course, it all depends on what books you read. Of course, you are going to get more out of what you read when you pick up Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn or John Milton’s Paradise Lost than if you are reading Stephenie Meyer’s “Twilight” series or … I dunno … a bodice ripper or the latest sword-and-sorcery-chicks-in-chainmail flavor of the month.

Not that there isn’t a place for literary brain candy and beach reads, there is. The fact that Stephenie Meyer has gotten millions of people to turn off the television and their game stations and log off and sit down and read is a feat unto itself and one that, to my knowledge, only J.K. Rowling has achieved in recent years, especially among teens. (The fact that the books are subsequently turned into films is another problem for another day (though I have touched on that here.)) Reading, even reading subpar books like Twilight promotes literacy and it builds vocabulary. I know that I have learned more vocabulary through reading than I ever did in school. Having a dictionary in your library used to be a must, but now with the advent of the internet and sites like dictionary.com and merriam-webster.com looking up a new word you run across is easier than ever.

Reading builds basic communication skills. Fostering reading in a child is a great way to help that child learn to communicate, and as the child grows and matures, and their reading tastes likewise grow and mature, their communication skills will improve. As with vocabulary, I think that a lot of how I communicate and express my ideas came from what I learned as I was reading, more so than learning proper sentence structure or what’s a gerund and what’s a helping verb in school ever did. When you read you instinctively (and often subconsciously) absorb how language is constructed. I still can’t quite tell you what a gerund is, or why one shouldn’t dangle participles, or why we shouldn’t split infinitives, but as is hopefully demonstrated by this blog, and this post in particular, I can construct coherent arguments and express myself in a way that is—again hopefully—rational, logical and above all persuasive. All that learned mostly from books.

Books and Reading Promote (Critical) Thought
Critical thought is, perhaps, one of the biggest casualties of our modern age. When the nightly news (or in some cases the 24 hour news) has a spin, angle, agenda, and narrative; when more people vote for the next “American Idol” than the President of the United States; when so-called “reality TV” is consistently the number one thing on television (and people actually believe it is “real” in spite of the credits that roll at the end of a show which often give the names of ten or more writers), and when in 2007 the Associated Press reported that one-fourth of American adults polled had not read a single book that year, it is no wonder that Americans are losing the ability to think critically about anything. I think that if the American public had not lost its critical thinking skills and had not handed over thought to the pundits and anchors and politicians (of any stripe) the ridiculous farce that is the current debate over health care would not be the shouting circus that it is, because when you sit down and start to look critically at the facts of the various bills, you begin to see where hyperbole (and outright lies) end and reality begins. I don’t mean to bring politics up, but it is a perfect example of what I am trying to say.

Reading of any kind, but especially reading books, helps to train our minds to think critically about what it is that we are putting in our heads. As I have said above, reading is an active medium, not a passive one like television or film. Books demand the Reader’s attention and force them to sit down, focus and think about what is being read. This is a fact with any book, but if you really want to train your mind to think critically, then you have to pick up something more than brain fluff. Twilight, no matter what its merits may or may not be, will not train you to think critically. Neither will the latest John Grisham, nor will Anne Rice or Charlaine Harris. As much as I may or may not like those authors, their books and their characters, reading The Rainmaker or Dead Until Dark or The Vampire Lestat will not engage your brain and your thinker in the way that the hefty books of literature out there will. If you really want to learn and think and think critically than you need to pick up the works of John Milton, of Don DeLillo, Charles Dickens, Charles Darwin, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Herman Melville, Toni Morrison, and William Shakespeare to name just a few. You will learn more about how to think about and how to react to and interact with the world around you from Morrison’s Song of Solomon, DeLillo’s White Noise, or Shakespeare’s Hamlet (quite possibly the greatest play ever written) than by reading all nine or ten of the books detailing Sookie’s romance with Vampire Bill.

Critical thought is, in my mind, the single most important tool that we as human beings in general and Americans in particular can have at our disposal. To be able to look at, think about, analyze and act on something critically is to be able to function in a world where we are constantly told how to think, act, and feel about everything. To think critically is to know what one should think about health care in America, to know how one should react when watching the evening news, or reading your morning paper. It is the ability to see beyond the spin, beyond the stats and polls and numbers that are thrown at us in our daily lives and find what is important and what is not. Is it important to catch all the coverage of Michael Jackson’s death and the subsequent hoopla that surrounded his passing? In the long run, probably not. Is it important to catch the ticker at the bottom of the screen while the talking heads are jabbering about Michael Jackson’s doctor and see that there is considerable Taliban opposition to democratic elections in Afghanistan or that the FDA is considering Okaying GMO food products as “organic”? Probably.

Reading helps train us to turn off our brain to the outside noise and stimuli and forces us to slow down and focus on one thing for five minutes or an hour or more. By cutting off the constant stream of information to our brain, we train our brain to look longer at something and by doing so, exercise our attention spans and stretch them so that we can pay attention for longer periods of time.

Books and Reading Promote “The Idea of Words”
“The Idea of Words” is perhaps the aspect of books and reading that excites me the most. I know, I am a book geek; I am a bibliophile with an out-of-control bibliobido, but the “Idea of Words” is exciting to me and something you should be excited about too!

Let me explain what I mean. In one of my favorite short stories by writer Sherman Alexie (titled “Special Delivery” and found in the collection The Business of Fancydancing), Alexie laments the decay of storytelling on the reservation through the story of tribal storyteller Thomas Builds-the-Fire. Through a series of unrelated but interconnected events, Thomas ends up on the run from the tribal police and barricades himself in the reservation post office. When the police arrive, Thomas tells the police to stay back because he has a gun (when, in fact, he does not). When the police call his bluff, he shouts out my favorite line in the story: “Maybe I got the idea of a gun, and that’s just as good.” This is what I mean when I talk about the “idea of words.” It is the ability to understand that, in fact, the pen is mightier than the sword. That imagination is just as powerful, and maybe even more powerful, than reality. The ability to understand not just what is being said or written, but to understand the idea behind what is being said or written is—along with critical thought—one of the most important tools that we as human beings can develop.

When Thomas Builds-the-Fire barricades himself in the post office and holds off the police with “the idea of a gun” he realizes that it is the dream or imagination that is infinitely more important than any actual by-product of those ideas. Alexie, through Thomas, shows that imagination and the idea of words is more powerful than the fact of reality, for it is through those ideas and through our imaginations that reality is shaped. The idea of a light bulb came to Edison before the light bulb and the idea of individual human and inalienable rights came before they were written down by Locke and codified by Jefferson, and with the idea of a gun, Thomas Builds-the-Fire holds the reservation post office hostage.

“The Idea of Words” is a powerful thing, and something that everyone needs to understand. All one has to do is look back at the recent American Presidential election to understand what the power of the “idea of words” really means. Think of the two words that were bandied about the most during the campaign: MAVERICK and CHANGE. Those two simple words—and the ideas that they supposedly embodied—polarized the American public to such a degree that turn-out in the 2008 American Presidential election was astounding. I won’t debate the validity of those words, that’s not why I bring them up. I bring them up because all they are is words. Two simple words: 11 unique letters between the two of them: three vowels and eight consonants, and yet these two words with such simple definitions (according to dictionary.com (maverick and change)) ignited a firestorm of political debate due to what exactly they meant in any one given context. Behold the power of the idea of words; the power of imagination over reality.

When you read, you understand the power of words. One only has to look at the longevity of such works as Paradise Lost and the plays of Shakespeare and the more recent powers of the “Harry Potter” and “Twilight” series to captivate and hold the imaginations of millions to see the “idea of words” at work. To see the power that reading has over the imagination, and thus over reality, for as we shape our imaginations, we shape our reality.

If you doubt me as to the power of reading and the power of the idea of words, I want you to watch THIS and then read Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and then ask yourself this question: Whose books were the Nazis burning? And then answer this: the works of H.G. Wells (a socialist and humanitarian), the works of Karl Marx, the works of John Locke, the works Heinrich Heine, Thomas Mann, Erich Maria Remarque … books whose ideas and words were deemed not to correspond with Nazi ideology. Why, I ask, if words have no power, did they burn them? Because words do have power. Ideas have power. And the idea of words can do more for the human mind than all of the enforced rules, laws and policies that any government can create and enforce. Again, read Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and you’ll see what I mean.


This is more or less (actually, this is much more than) the conversation that I had with my brother-in-law, and the arguments I made for why a library of books is an important (and even essential) thing to have in a home. I concluded with the following: When parents choose to make a place for books in their home, whether it is a few shelves in the living room and bedrooms, or an entire room dedicated and centered on reading it conveys to children an emphasis on books. Books should be a focal point in the home, and not the television or the computer or Xbox or what-have-you. When books are emphasized in such a way, when children see their parents reading and hear their parents discussing books and the ideas in them, when they are read to, it reinforces to the child that reading is something to be valued and esteemed, and when reading and books are valued it means that these three points: Intelligence, Critical Thought and The Idea of Words are things that have value and are important. As a child is taught so he grows (to badly paraphrase) and if intelligence, critical thought and ideas are cultivated while young, then they are what the grown child will reap later in life, much to their benefit.

One of the greatest pleasures I have in life is reading, and nothing does my heart better than to unexpectedly come across my two young children (they’re 3½ and 1½) reading a book. (Such as the candid moment we caught in the photograph that accompanies this post: my son and daughter had each gotten a book, curled up together on the comfy armchair in my library and pulling the blanket up on them, “read” to each other.) When, unprompted, they turn off the television (or don’t want it turned on in the first place) and pick up a book, or ask me to read them a book, my heart soars, because even at this young age, they understand that books and the ideas and values that they promote are important because my wife and I make books a priority in our home.

If you can’t make books in the home a priority (due to finances) and would like to, then your local library is a great solution. We visit the library on a regular basis (at least once a week) and our kids look forward to it each and every time. Their eyes light up and they will consent to getting dressed and putting on shoes if it means they get to go to the library. Once their, aside from running around and meeting other children, they love to choose books and put them in our canvas library bag. My son gets honestly sad and distressed when we have to return a book he’s fallen in love with. One of the first ASL signs that they both learned was library (you make the L sign with your right hand and make little circles with it). Libraries are a great way to instill in a child a love of books and reading when having gobs of books in your home just isn’t practical.

This is the value of having a library of books in a home and this is why I have created and maintain this blog in spite of the grief that it sometimes gives me: because books and reading build better, thinking world citizens.

Teaser Tuesdays: A Matter of Taste

Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:




  • Grab your current read
  • Open to a random page
  • Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
  • BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (Make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
  • Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!
My current read, which I am a mere ten or so pages from finishing, is Rob MacGregor’s Indiana Jones and the Seven Veils. It’s a great book, and as soon as I possibly can, I’ll have the review up. Until then, here is a little teaser from the book:


Indiana Jones and the Seven Veils
-Indiana Jones Series, Book #3-
(New York: Bantam Books, 1991)
Paperback, 291 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9780553293340, US$4.99

My Teaser: “The Morcego men were dancing and singing around them, while the women were stacking dried wood in preparation for a feast. Indy had no doubt about the main course on the Morcego menu” (262).

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Dead Until Dark

-Southern Vampire Mysteries Series, Book 1-
(New York: Penguin Books, 2001)
Paperback, 292 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9780441008537, US$7.99

ABCD Rating: DITCH

“I’d been waiting for the vampire for years when he walked into the bar.” (1)

From the Cover: Sookie Stackhouse is a small-time cocktail waitress in small-town Louisiana. She’s quiet, keeps to herself, and doesn’t get out much. Not because she’s not pretty. She is. It’s just that, well, Sookie has this sort of “disability.” She can read minds. And that doesn’t make her too dateable. And then along comes Bill. He’s tall, dark, handsome—and Sookie can’t hear a word he’s thinking. He’s exactly the type of guy she’s been waiting for all her life. … But Bill has a disability of his own: He’s a vampire with a bad reputation. He hangs with a seriously creepy crowd, all suspected of—big surprise—murder. And when one of Sookie’s coworkers is killed, she fears she’s next. …

My Review: I’m not sure exactly what compelled me to pick up Harris’ novel. Curiosity, more likely than not, and the fact that after reading The Omnivore’s Dilemma I needed brain candy, and boy-howdy is Dead Until Dark brain candy.

There is not much here. The plot is pretty simplistic (I had actually pegged the villain of the piece about a third of the way into the book) and there were no real surprises. Harris is a mediocre writer at best that has managed to tap into the current literary vogue: vampire porn. What’s more is that it took Stephenie Meyer’s teenage version of Harris’ story to bring Harris’ novels into the limelight. Dead Until Dark was written a full four years before Twilight and yet Harris has not hit the mainstream, to the best of my knowledge, until recently. I guess the HBO series True Blood, which is based on Harris’ books, can also be attributed to bringing Harris into the limelight, but even that getting green-lighted at HBO can probably be attributed to Meyer’s success.

Perhaps it is the fact that, deep down, this is in fact a bodice ripper meant to fulfill the fantasies of frustrated housewives, but the book did nothing for me. Sookie was annoying, Bill dull, and the conflict—vampire “coming out of the coffin” and all that that implies—was so anticlimactic that I was able to blow right through the book without much resistance. Really, though, it was with the character of Vampire Bill that I had the most problems.

When I was in New Orleans this last April for the annual PCA/ACA conference, I attended one session that was devoted to vampires. I was curious to see what the academic community made of the recent surge in popularity of vampires in the popular culture. What I wasn’t prepared for was the lengths to which people went to bring a scholarly approach to Harris and Meyer, and in all honesty … none of it was convincing. I left in the lull after the second presenter finished and before the third began. That was all I could take.

Most of the talk centered on the idea of the “Bad Boy,” and how popular the “Bad Boy” was in pop culture. In particular the “Bad Boy” as represented by Edward Cullen, Vampire Bill and Spike from Buffy the Vampire Slayer. The general consensus was that Edward was not a “Bad Boy” and that Vampire Bill and Spike better represented the allure to women of the untamed rebel. After reading Dead Until Dark, I do not get that argument. Listening to these presenters speak, I was expecting Vampire Bill to be some kind of mix between Spike and Dracula, with a little bit of Robert Downey, Jr. thrown in for good measure. What I did not expect was a vampire who wants to “mainstream,” drink faux-blood, has problems with contractors and runs for public office. Is this the “Bad Boy” image I’ve heard so much about? The only “Bad Boy” aspect of Bill seems to be that he bites Sookie on the neck and sucks her blood in the throes of sex, other than that, he is a pretty bland character, described in only the most generic of terms: dark hair, pale, shining skin, brooding eyes … fangs. Oh, and apparently, sex with a vampire is supposed to be spectacular, and Bill is apparently the Don Juan of vampires.

The fact of his vampirism is secondary to the fact that he is impossibly perfect for Sookie, take it away and he is no different than the myriad of other studs in similar romance novels that sweep the unassuming heroine off her feet and into the bed. The only difference is that Bill cannot show his face during the day, and even then, most of the action in any given romance novel happens at night anyway. (And even then, Harris’ novel is pretty mediocre in the sex department as well … lots of candle-lit hot tubs because, *gasp* Vampire Bill has a thing for warm water. Yawn.)

All this just illustrates the point I made above: Harris is a mediocre writer at best. I had no emotional investment in the characters and when the climax of the action comes midway through—with what I guess is supposed to be a shocking death—I was so uninterested in the characters that I did not care at all, Harris didn’t make me care about the characters, and so I didn’t care for her story, and so I was unmoved by the emotion. There is a subplot—though maybe B-Story is a better term—about someone killing women who get sexually involved with vampires but when the revelation comes it too is so anticlimactic (as I said I guessed, rightly, who was doing it very early on) and so formulaic as to be uninteresting.

Apparently there are nine books in the series with a tenth on the way in October 2009 and an eleventh in May 2010, but I think I will be taking my leave of Sookie and Bill and all the rest of the denizens of Bon Temps, Louisiana, here and not continue on any further. There are just too many better books out there to be wasting my (and your) precious reading time with this series for which I had some high expectations.

My friend over at reading by publight also reviewed Dead Until Dark, and much more charitably than I, I might add, and has gone on to review further installments in the Southern Vampire Mystery series.

Friday, August 21, 2009

The Friday 56: Burnt Offerings

The Friday 56 is hosted by Storytime with Tonya and Friends

RULES

  1. Grab the book nearest you. Right now.
  2. Turn to page 56.
  3. Find the fifth sentence.
  4. Post that sentence (plus one or two others if you like).
  5. Post a link with your post to Storytime (and here on Bryan’s Book Blog, I’d like to know what book you’ve got at hand).
This week, the nearest book to hand was the same book that was my A-Z Wednesday book (goes to show how often I put books back) which was, as you all already know, Robert Marasco’s Burnt Offerings, and turning to page 56 we find the following:

“‘What do you think of it, the old homestead’” (56).
Chilling, isn’t it? And so, there we are and as they say in Brasil: Até mais!

Friday Finds: August 21, 2009

Friday Finds (hosted by Should Be Reading)

What great books did you hear about/discover this past week?
Share with us your FRIDAY FINDS!

Here are a couple I found through a book-related thread in an online community I belong to, one’s from Slate’s “Chose Your Own Apocalypse” application, the Indiana Jones novel was one I discovered while listening to the audiobook edition of The Lost City of Z (both Colonel Fawcett and Z figure heavily in Indy’s adventure) and then of course there is S&S&SM … it really should appear in my Friday Finds every week until it is released in September. I will be first in line for this book in Bellingham. I. Cannot. WAIT! Its sister story—Pride and Prejudice and Zombies—was so good, that I actually read the original Austen and enjoyed it. Maybe the same will happen with Sense and Sensibility. My Victorian Lit and Romantic British Lit professor would be so proud!

One Second After by William R. Forstchen
Everything Matters! by Ron Currie, Jr.
Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters by Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Booking Through Thursday: The Bestest

Well, another Thursday is upon us, and that means it is time for yet another Booking Through Thursday prompt. What will it be this week, you ask? Here you go…


Prompt: What’s the best book you’ve read recently?
(Tell me you didn’t see this one coming?)


My initial response to this is Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith. But that was back in April and I don’t think that that necessarily counts as “current” … so I believe it might just end up being a tie between two books:

Good Book: The Bizarre, Hilarious, Disturbing, Marvelous, and Inspiring Things I Learned When I Read Every Single Word of the Bible (Audio) by David Plotz, read by The Author (Newark: Audible, Inc., 2009)







and

The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals by Michael Pollan (New York: Penguin Books, 2006)











Rather than rehash all of my reasons why I loved these books, I’ll just link you to the reviews: Good Book is reviewed HERE and The Omnivore’s Dilemma is reviewed HERE.

Until next Thursday…